SHORT ANSWER
Every NGN case study follows the same six steps. Know which step an item is testing, and you know what kind of answer it wants.
What are the six clinical judgment steps?
Each step asks a different question. The item types below are common pairings, not fixed rules.
| Step | What it is really asking | Often tested with |
|---|---|---|
| Recognize cues | Which findings matter here? | Highlight, matrix, select all |
| Analyze cues | What could these findings mean? | Drop-down cloze, matrix |
| Prioritize hypotheses | Which problem is most likely or most urgent? | Drop-down cloze, bowtie |
| Generate solutions | What should the plan include, or avoid? | Matrix, select all |
| Take action | What do I do now? | Select all, multiple choice, ordered response |
| Evaluate outcomes | Did it work? | Matrix (effective or not), highlight |
Worked example, part 1: noticing and naming the problem
A 72-year-old client is on day one after a right hip replacement and is receiving a scheduled anticoagulant. At handoff, the night nurse mentions she reinforced the dressing at 04:00 because of drainage. Vitals: 07:00 heart rate 88, blood pressure 128/76. 08:30 heart rate 102, blood pressure 112/70. 09:40 heart rate 118, blood pressure 92/58. The client is pale and the right thigh looks more swollen.
Recognize cues. The item might show the nurse's note and ask you to highlight findings that need follow-up. The reinforced dressing, the rising heart rate, the falling blood pressure, the pallor and the thigh swelling all matter. Pain of 6 out of 10 on day one is expected and is the distractor.
Analyze cues. Now link the findings to possible problems. Heart rate up and blood pressure down together, after surgery, on an anticoagulant, fit blood loss. Pulmonary embolism is possible after hip surgery, but there is no chest pain or low oxygen. Opioid toxicity would slow breathing, not speed the heart.
Prioritize hypotheses. The most likely and most urgent problem is hypovolemia from bleeding. On a bowtie, that goes in the center.
Worked example, part 2: acting and checking
Generate solutions. Decide what belongs in the plan: lay the client flat with legs raised, hold the next anticoagulant dose, notify the provider, and prepare for labs and fluids. Getting the client up to a chair or giving more opioid would be unsafe right now.
Take action. A typical item asks what to do first, or which actions to take now. Positioning and staying with the client come before calling, because they help immediately. Then report using SBAR.
Evaluate outcomes. After fluids and a transfusion, the item gives new data and asks which findings show improvement: heart rate back under 100, blood pressure climbing, urine output at least 0.5 mL per kg per hour, and a stable hemoglobin. A heart rate still at 115 would be ineffective.
What mistakes cost the most points on case studies?
- Reading only the newest data. The answer is often in the trend across three or more time points.
- Treating every abnormal value as the priority. Ask which one threatens airway, breathing or circulation now.
- Acting before assessing when the situation is not an emergency.
- Over-selecting on select-all and matrix items. Under plus/minus scoring, each wrong selection subtracts a point.
- Bringing in facts that aren't in the case. Answer from the client in front of you.
How can you practice this every day?
Practice on full cases, not only single questions. Pick one case a day and name the step before you answer each item. RN Prep Pro is built around this: every shift is one long unfolding case, every question is tagged to a clinical judgment step, and the debrief shows which step needs work. After three shifts, your readiness view shows your weakest step across all of them.
Try it next time
On your next case, write the step name next to each item before you answer it. Check whether your answer type matched the step.
Quick answers
How many case studies are on the NCLEX-RN?
The NCLEX-RN includes three case studies. Each has six items, and each item maps to one of the six steps of the Clinical Judgment Measurement Model. The exam also has standalone NGN items such as bowtie and trend questions.
Are NGN case study items scored with partial credit?
Many are. NCSBN uses 0/1 scoring for some items, plus/minus scoring for items like select all that apply, where wrong selections subtract points, and rationale scoring for linked pairs or triads. Bowtie items are worth up to five points.
What is the difference between analyze cues and prioritize hypotheses?
Analyze cues means linking findings to possible explanations. Prioritize hypotheses means ranking those explanations to decide which is most likely or most urgent for this client right now.
Sources & further reading (3)
- NCSBN: Clinical Judgment Measurement Model ↗
- NCSBN: Current NGN scoring models ↗
- NCSBN: 2026 NCLEX-RN Test Plan (PDF) ↗
Published by RN Prep Pro, the app described in these guides. Competitor details come from each provider's own pages in October 2026 and may change. NCLEX® and NCLEX-RN® are registered trademarks of NCSBN; RN Prep Pro is not affiliated with or endorsed by NCSBN. Educational study guidance, not patient-care advice or a guarantee of examination results. Suggest a correction.



